Quote:
“Oh and If I get personal, it is only when someone attacks Adam. Know that for future reference.” … “Urban didn’t come whining to me or Adam.”
You ignore, then highlight the issue I described in my previous post. Its not admin abuse, its your friends above all, which when put into practice results in admin abuse. Its called, favouritism. And you act smart enough to know this.
You can’t hide dark deeds behind shiney intentions and ‘act’ the high and mighty when the original arguement is unfortunately initially flawed.
You’re obviously a keen person with a fairly good and expanding intellect, if you’d learned in this instance instead of acting based on your feelings you could’ve easily come back with a very valid arguement, and you probably still should. Unfortunately you’re pushing dramatics over logical and ethical outcomes.
People react badly to people who act badly. Language should be moderated some what to fall inline with Club and Campus standards. And, often people involved in this instance are the ones reminding people like me about this fact. But again, people react badly to people who act badly.
I’II conclude by saying that Clubs like these are a learning experience for all actively involved. This instance again is a learning experience, its not an instance to chastise the Club but to reinforce the message of the experience to further the Club and its main assets, which are those who respect it and those who run it. This is probably something that you’re trying to do, but the approach can be faulted this time round.