yea but all the other things are nessisay like the blue ray player if you do have a hd tv…cause im sure if everyone had a hd tv and a hd dvd or blue ray player they would buy the movies
NoDice said:
lol at kuros graphs. i think “Gamespy” hired a 8year old little girl to make that graph.
its cute…
anyways, i think everyone should take the advice from someone with a sugger daddy which has bought them both consuls, this way it limits the bias twards the one “you” have. and even then its still an opinion. so my opinion is PC > (xbox + ps3 + mac)^2
Edit: my 4 seconds on google found this
i appriciate it…thats what i was trying to find…and no im not a sony fan boy….i had an xbox and played it most of the time because it was better then the ps2 slightly…..and i soly stick to that way of gameing….i got the ps3 because it was overall the better system…it just sucks xbox360 came out a year before ps3 did so the supply of games is low…but no matter…i can just as easily play ps2 and ps1 games on it
also if anyone is interested go to http://www.IEEE.org to see published documentation done by a group of engineeers to get the reall answers…they have charts and graphs of every little thing and they talk about how the data is processed and distrubuted step by step in each system….in the study there they found that both the systems tests tested equally except for the fact that the ps3 because of the cell engine called the PPE asks the other 8cells called SPEs to do calculations for the ppe… this set up was designed to take the load off the main processor so they could push a bigger bader game…now the xbox has vurtualy the same set up in a diffrent form…except it has 3 processors instead of 9…so not for a couple of years you may not see the diffrence…but it is there…and not to mention above…its not that i am a sony fan boy…its because i thought it was a better investment