MasterP said:
Well let’s put this in Darwin liberal terms then. How does a species reproduce? It’s not male-male, it’s male-female. If *edited*s don’t reproduce eventually that “genetic abnormality” will extinct itself and we’ll be back to status-quo as nature intended. IF however it’s not genetic and truely is a choice, as us “ultra-conservatives” believe, then regardless of how much homosexuals don’t reproduce they’ll always be more of them. According to genetics and nature, this is not possible. Unless homosexuality is a disease and I’m not going that route.
nowadays we have test tube babies, so technically they could reproduce 
a choice would be whether i want chocolate or vanilla ice cream. I don’t choose to have relations with women, I am attracted to them. Tell me, if it’s a choice, what could possibly be causing them to choose that? The devil? lol
but wait, lets back up a little. There is evidence of homosexual behavior in animals. Sure they can’t reproduce, and therefore should die off, and do. But then the following generation those blasted homos are back! but how? Now, are you telling me then that they are choosing to do that? So now ‘ultra-conservatives’ would be conceding to the fact that animals have consciousness?!?! That totally goes against the conservative way rofl
just thought it kinda funny, of course animal behavior is not rational but instinctive. Could it be that is where it comes from, that some people’s instincts tell them their *edited*? hmm..maybe. I guess the question arises is whether or not you believe we are born with instincts or a clean slate. Oh how fun that lecture was in philosophy class!