RaveN said:
Blow up dolls and flesh lights don’t count.
Harsh? Perhaps…but no more harsh than cracking jokes about the dead in hopes that people will think you’re actually witty, instead of some poor forum lurker who quotes television and copies and pastes jokes. Sorry, but somebody who can’t respect the dead, and makes jokes about the deceased, doesn’t deserve anything less than “harsh”, and is down right dispicable.
Btw, if he was so guilty, why did they find him innocent on his second charge in 04? Apparently they had enough evidence to put him away for life. Oh dear, he bought the courts!11!
“From what I hear” belongs nowhere in the conversation. What self respecting parent accepts money, after some guy molested their child? Not a very good one. If I was that parent, and he actually did those things to my child, not only would I not drop the charges, but I would have been out for blood. As a celebrity as big as Michael Jackson, and with as immature as he was (due to lack of a childhood), you would hate to be called a monster, and would do anything to make it go away. Not only that, but the person Michael paid off, Evan Chandler (father of the “victim”) was abusive to his own family to begin with. It’s plain STUPID to assume he did it based on what you “think” you know, and its down right LOGICAL to believe they were after his money, but NOOOOO, he’s a celebrity, so he HAS TO be guilty. It’s also known that they had even MORE evidence for the second charge against him, which he was found innocent on.
Quit comparing this to OJ. There isn’t even close to as much evidence to suggest the accusations are true in Michaels case. In fact, just the opposite, which is why he was found NOT GUILTY.
What is with you people? You base your opinions on media image, and not those of cold hard factual information, and the FACT remains, that he was found innocent on ALL counts, so you’re opinions are null and invalid. I revert back to what I said before, with the advances in forensic evidence we have, they would have found him guilty, had he done it.
</conversation>
*edited*ing owned.
btw, i said all this, just not in a bad *edited* raven kind of way. I don’t get it either though, I mean if you really believed he was a pedo, jokes aside, why would you listen to his music? It’s like when i found out Tommy Hill Figure was a racist prick, i stopped buying all his clothes, or how bout when peewee herman got caught jacking off in the bath room, or michael vick was thrown in jail for killing dogs. The difference is all those people were guilty, MJ was not. But still people call him a child molester, yet still will throw his music on. I call that hypocritical, and well those people should burn tbh. Doesn’t make sense to me, to call a guy a pedo, but then turn around and do the moonwalk or thriller or jam to billie jean.
I’m not sure if this makes any sense, i’m quite drunk off of sangria. only two more days in barcalona =(