NuRayZ said:
Okay I know for a fact major gets poon all the time. I’ve seen the pics to prove it. He practically invented Eiffel Towering
Blow up dolls and flesh lights don’t count.
MasterP said:
That’s a little harsh don’t you think?
Harsh? Perhaps…but no more harsh than cracking jokes about the dead in hopes that people will think you’re actually witty, instead of some poor forum lurker who quotes television and copies and pastes jokes. Sorry, but somebody who can’t respect the dead, and makes jokes about the deceased, doesn’t deserve anything less than “harsh”, and is down right dispicable.
MasterP said:
Btw, if he was so innocent, why did he pay to make the first lawsuit go away? That is now illegal in the state of California and was made so after he did it. From what I hear the evidence was pretty damning.
Btw, if he was so guilty, why did they find him innocent on his second charge in 04? Apparently they had enough evidence to put him away for life. Oh dear, he bought the courts!11!
“From what I hear” belongs nowhere in the conversation. What self respecting parent accepts money, after some guy molested their child? Not a very good one. If I was that parent, and he actually did those things to my child, not only would I not drop the charges, but I would have been out for blood. As a celebrity as big as Michael Jackson, and with as immature as he was (due to lack of a childhood), you would hate to be called a monster, and would do anything to make it go away. Not only that, but the person Michael paid off, Evan Chandler (father of the “victim”) was abusive to his own family to begin with. It’s plain STUPID to assume he did it based on what you “think” you know, and its down right LOGICAL to believe they were after his money, but NOOOOO, he’s a celebrity, so he HAS TO be guilty. It’s also known that they had even MORE evidence for the second charge against him, which he was found innocent on.
Quit comparing this to OJ. There isn’t even close to as much evidence to suggest the accusations are true in Michaels case. In fact, just the opposite, which is why he was found NOT GUILTY.
What is with you people? You base your opinions on media image, and not those of cold hard factual information, and the FACT remains, that he was found innocent on ALL counts, so you’re opinions are null and invalid. I revert back to what I said before, with the advances in forensic evidence we have, they would have found him guilty, had he done it.
</conversation>