- This topic has 19 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I don’t blame them, they are a business that cater to retards. let them crop away.
theirs not a news station out that that does not do it. Its all about how bad they can make a situations appear, we can only blame ourselves, they televise what the majority wants to see. News channs report what teenage girls thrive on. consisting of any number of situations that have an easy solution, which would bring a fairly good outcome, but these girls choose another, *edited*ty, bad way to deal with it, again consisting of backstabbing, blackmailing, gossiping are the all-too-common lulz ramble wut?
There are problems with all the 24-hour news networks, but Fox is the least flawed. If you want to see a truly corrupt news network, watch MSNBC. According to the ratings, you will be the only one.
MasterP will no doubt be on here defending fox, but as ephriam said MSNBC is as bad if not worse, just swings the other way. CNN is better, but if you are naive enough to think it’d nonbiased… well you just failed at life.
if you really wanted unbiased news, you should probably look at http://www.bbc.co.uk/
adam37 said:
if you really wanted unbiased news, you should probably look at http://www.bbc.co.uk/agreed.
hold on British news isn’t biased? Ive seen tons of material on BBC which is clearly anti american, and probably exagerated, and definitely appearing as biased. For example, the supposed massacre in afghanistan, reported by bbc, which says we supposedly killed about 3000 Afghani prisoners, and buried them somewhere in the desert. I will say i am fond of BBC, but jsut because they are a public service based statutory corporation claiming to not be biased doesn’t mean they aren’t. Although they may be less biased than others. I realize most media is biased, which is unfortunate, in fact I’d say EVERY media outlet is. The twists, the twangs, the “pretty stuff”, is all anyone cares about these days =/. On both sides. Hopefully one day, we will ALL wake up, until then I say give me my bloody steak, even if it really just is reprocessed human waste!
But Fox news is not the least flawed… are you serious?
MSNBC is very bad, but I would say Fox is JUST as bad, but on the opposite side.
While we may blame the media for being biased sources, we should also look at ourselves, for we view these supposedly biased outlets with very biased lens. A conservative may think Fox news is unbiased while thinking cnn is biased, while a democrat, like myself, thinks the opposite.
Personally, I’d say say Fox is the least biased of the major news networks. Do many of the commentators lean slightly right? Yeah, but they are usually paired off with a liberal commentator to keep things even. Also, the reporters stick to reporting and leave the commentary to the commentators.
And while we’re talking about CNN:
And one more dig at MSNBC because they’re so lame:
Ephraim said:
Personally, I’d say say Fox is the least biased of the major news networks. Do many of the commentators lean slightly right? Yeah, but they are usually paired off with a liberal commentator to keep things even. Also, the reporters stick to reporting and leave the commentary to the commentators.And while we’re talking about CNN:
And one more dig at MSNBC because they’re so lame:
That reporter was a *edited*, and I’m not sure what you are trying to get at? CNN is biased, and so is Fox news.
While it would be fun to bring up the infinite amount of garbage that comes from both Fox news and CNN, I don’t really think its necessary.
And the T-bagging thing was hilarious
No matter how many examples you give, there is always a fox news counter to show…its a retardly dumb argument to try and prove that fox news is the least unbiased. Just like its retarded to try and argue the fact that CNN or MSNBC is the MOST biased.
Like this, rofl:
And those liberal commentators, are paid by fox, just like cnn has conservative commentators.
NuRayZ said:
Most republicans want to argue.And you don’t?
Quote:
But there is nothing to argue here? No matter how many examples you give, there is always a fox news counter to show…its a retardly dumb argument to try and prove that fox news is the least unbiased. Just like its retarded to try and argue the fact that CNN or MSNBC is the MOST biased.I do believe you started this thread with a video criticising Fox. Then I post videos criticising the competition, so suddenly posting examples becomes retarded. There is an enormous amount of filth regularly coming out of MSNBC, compared to only the occaisional gaffe being made on Fox. But, if you refuse to talk about content, how about ratings?
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/16/rati…party-coverage/
MSNBC barely matters anymore and will likely be gone in a few years. CNN remains a healthy second, but rarely beats
Fox.
While we’re at it, here’s a brief section of Bernard Goldberg’s essay “Fox Derangement Syndrome”:
“All those lefties getting so much face time on Fox should make your run-of-the-mill liberals very happy, right? But it doesn’t. Why? Two reasons: First, they don’t even noticce the liberals on Fox, in much the same way that a fish doesn’t notice the water he’s swimming in. Seeing liberals on the news seems so natural to liberals that it doesn’t register as any big deal. Second, they do notice the conservatives who are debating the liberals. They stick out like the proverbial sore thumb. And their very presence–actually, their very existence–makes liberals mad.
Their anger leads to a debilitating disorientation. Liberals, remember, are used to getting their news from CBS, PBS, NBC, and ABC. They aren’t accustomed to seeing conservatives on television. Can you imagine how they feel, the poor darlings–the ones who actually watch Fox, that is–when they tune in to Hannity & Colmes? They hate Colmes, the liberal, because he isn’t crazy enough for them. And they hate Hannity because, well, because he’s a conservative. The agony must be unbearable.
And you know what else drives them bonkers? Fox’s ‘Fair and Balanced’ slogan. Oh, how thay hate it! It’s like a sharp stick in their eye. How, they scrream, can a news operation possibly be “fair and balanced” when it has the gall to present both sides of the argument!”
Ephraim said:
And you don’t?(facepalm)
I’m willing to bet you haven’t the slightest bit of reasonable proof to back up that lie..
betcha i do!! According to Hannity’s very own reasoning, it appears he sides with antisemites:
and pwease dont edit my posts <3
now of course he is not “really” anti-semitic, but by his logic, if Obama is “friends” with domestic terrorists, why is he having anti-semites on his show?!?
1. Sorry I accidently edited your post. I ment to hit “quote.” Whoops.
2. The clip you showed only proves that Sean Hannity is willing to debate ant-semites. Sean Hannity worked with a jewish person (Alan Colmes) for over a decade and often has other jewish people (Bernard Goldberg, *edited* Morris, ect.) on his new show.
3. Even Alan Colmes thinks he’s not an anti-semite. Duh.
He used an Anti-semite, Andy Martin, to speak against Obama. And even gave his book airtime. Thats not deplorable??
Some random guy, with good points (to me)
guilt by association? rofl Hal and Sean!
btw, by no means do i believe any of this, I just find it interesting. No one is perfect, everyone is a little hypocritical, some more than others, but hypocritical nonetheless.
NoDice said:
99% of “news” contains *edited*thus why i only go to theonion.com
I get my news from the world’s most trusted news sources: The Onion, The Daily Show, and The Tonight Show. If it’s not on there, I don’t care.
So you’re bashing Fox because they cut out the part where Al Gore admitting to profitting off his global warming campaign? Who’s side are you on?
They were doing him a favor.
MasterP said:
So you’re bashing Fox because they cut out the part where Al Gore admitting to profitting off his global warming campaign? Who’s side are you on?They were doing him a favor.
watch the whole thing maybe?
kk thx
and no where did i bash fox in the original post. rofl, i only posted a youtube,
the bashing proceeded after
NuRayZ said:
watch the whole thing maybe?kk thx
So you’re also upset they cut out his lies and campaign promises he’s already broke?
The last video is retarded, they’re comparing MSNBC’s live feed of the speech to a Fox News brief summary 3 hours after the speech. Biased much? I’m sure Fox didn’t cut that part out when they were showing the live feed but who knows, it’s all one big conspiracy you know.
Besides, the video was made by MediaMatters. MediaMatters is on the same level as Michael Moore on the propaganda scale.
- The forum ‘Political Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.