torankusu said:
I wasn’t even talking to you. The reason why you think I ignored your point is because I was talking to sticky. I was talking about why lockem would be in there.
Thanks for trying to be a jerk, as usual (and if this is not your intent, sorry, but you certainly come off as one), but I was actually supporting your stance on the issue. I admit that I should’ve quoted sticky — sorry about that — but don’t come off as so confrontational. You didn’t really here, but you do, well, pretty much all the time.
Your post directly answered mine and was arguing against the point I was trying to make. If you weren’t talking to me you sure hid it well.
If you were trying to support my stance it sure didn’t look like it. It looked alot like you were backing up sticky’s sentiment.
As to that last part, idk what to say. First you thank me for being a jerk, then apologize for not making your post clearer, then say that I wasn’t a jerk, then tell me not to be so confrontational, then admit that I wasn’t confrontational this time. Wtf man?