Home › Forum Archive › Game Server Discussion › Counter-Strike: Source Discussion › please rate me as a admin
- This topic has 27 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by
distemper.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 18, 2009 at 2:36 pm #6674
Ex
SpectatorI’m asking everyone to please place a vote on how you fill i have been as a admin for the wcugaming club in the time i have been around . I will not hold hard fillings towards anyone that may have a negative thoughts about me for any reason . I just want to know how i have been doing in the going on 3 years i have been a supporter and admin of the club .
February 18, 2009 at 2:39 pm #71356Adam Faulkner
Spectatoreveryone makes mistakes. You have had some mistakes. But your intention is to always help the progress of the club.
February 18, 2009 at 3:13 pm #71361Bananarchy
SpectatorAdam Faulkner said:
everyone makes mistakes. You have had some mistakes. But your intention is to always help the progress of the club.I agree to some degree Adam
I didn’t vote since none of the three options really reflect your situation. You are a very dedicated admin that I think has the best of intentions. You are more active than many other admins, and you have a lot less tolerance for infractions. I think this last point might be what gets you into trouble sometimes. Having only recently joined I don’t have a perfect perspective, but I the number of accusations of abuse number of bans originating from you have not gone unnoticed. (Don’t get me wrong, i DID appreciate you coming on yesterday and taking care of that guy
). Anyway, based on my limited experience, you seem like a genuinely good person, who just takes a very hard-line stance occasionally that may get you into hot water.
Best,
Bana
February 18, 2009 at 3:20 pm #71363AngelEllaine
SpectatorPerhaps this will develop into some sort of grading system, a poll on each admin on how to public grades us on stuff like commitment/activeness/etc etc >_> *Dear i hate those reportcard days back in highschool/middleschool*
Anyways Ex, you are great admin, although you could put some more intermediate vote values. Anyways keep up the great work! Remember, ban first, ask questions later! (jkjk)
February 18, 2009 at 3:31 pm #71364Ex
Spectatorideas on other options that may help others on the voting are welcome. OK i added a few new options for people to vote for instead of the 3 i had . If you can think of any more option please let me know and ill be glad to update it . And yes i think it would be a good thing for the admins to be graded on there positions as admin for the club seeing as most of the peeps that play on our servers are regulars to the club and servers they are very good at grading our admins as they see what other may not at times .
February 18, 2009 at 4:20 pm #71368AngelEllaine
SpectatorYou know, just keeping it simple like 1,2,3,4,5 number system would work. Because sometimes the description doesn’t fit the circumstance, but with numbers you can just ask them why they added,deducted points. :<
February 18, 2009 at 6:42 pm #71393Ex
Spectatorone thing if you vote a negative position i would like you to explain your position to help me better myself as a admin
February 19, 2009 at 12:25 am #71420MajorMajorMajor
Spectatoryour an a-hole <3
February 19, 2009 at 1:59 am #71431Ex
Spectatoromg some one picked the right one 🙂
February 19, 2009 at 10:17 am #71442newrayz
SpectatorI couldn’t pick more than one, so I picked my favorite of your choices. the last

Everyone needs an a-hole <3
lol jk
February 24, 2009 at 3:24 am #72057Renton’s Big Bro
SpectatorEx i’ve been around awhile and i have to say your one of the best admins I know. You play often, uphold the rules, have fun in an appropriate way. You know exactly what’s expected of you as an admin as well as the ins and outs of the admin contract we all agreed to. You’ve been here a long time, and you shouldn’t get down on yourself because of one thing or another someone said. I think you have excellent morals, I’ve seen you stand up for people that deserved it and defended them whole-heartedly. I think you do what you think is right, and never out of spite or anything else. I think you are a model admin, yes possibly a little uptight, but that’s fine. I’d rather there a rating better than good, but that’s the best one i could find up there man. Keep up the good work.
February 24, 2009 at 9:51 pm #72218Dean Winchester
Spectatoryou’re a really good admin and i’ve known that you’ve been here with wcu for awhile. you seem to be always on (and sometimes even idling or on the phone lol jk) because usually im always on haha. but all in all you’re a good admin make pretty good decisions and uphold the rules really well.
other than that you should buy a kit more!
February 25, 2009 at 12:24 am #72250B R I E F S
SpectatorDidn’t you used to play 1.6?
February 27, 2009 at 4:24 pm #72655Ex
Spectatori did yes briefs
March 2, 2009 at 12:54 pm #72883LuckySeven
SpectatorI think u do a fine job besides yelling at me for getting on your nerves lolol.
March 3, 2009 at 2:35 pm #72983PistolPete
SpectatorI like Ex as an admin. He actually seems to get stuff done when it is needed. And one warning is enough in my opinion then action should be taken. So thz Ex for keeping things in line when you are on.
March 3, 2009 at 3:07 pm #72992Citan001
SpectatorYour a good admin Ex. Always takin care of silly goose and his mic spamming and those *edited* bunny hoppers.
March 3, 2009 at 6:27 pm #73013king kong
SpectatorEx, your a great admin. I play on Western all the time and you by far are one of the better admins. You know how to take care of things and you are fair. And this whole time i’ve been playing on Western i have never seen you abuse your admin power. You don’t discourage others and you make the game fun. You are an excellent role model in the game for people. Keep up the good work…

-Kong
March 28, 2009 at 4:53 pm #76473fRoSt
SpectatorEx is always a good name to see in the server when im playing, But you never say hi to me,
.March 28, 2009 at 8:26 pm #76492lockEm
SpectatorWhere’s the “*edited*ing terrible” option?
L!O!L JK
April 12, 2009 at 11:06 pm #78998TEH WHALE
Spectatoryou need to slap more people honestly
April 13, 2009 at 12:09 pm #79085Derrick LeBrocq
Spectator<3 Ex.
April 13, 2009 at 12:26 pm #79092Citan001
SpectatorTEH WHALE said:
you need to slap more people honestlyThe slap does not work right now. If we slap for any damage it goes through as a slay dont know why but thats why we dont use it.
April 13, 2009 at 1:55 pm #79122distemper
SpectatorfRoSt said:
Ex is always a good name to see in the server when im playing, But you never say hi to me,
.…because you buttrape him with the your m4 all the time, maybe?
Then again, you buttrape all of us with your m4…
It’s probably just Ex.
April 13, 2009 at 4:17 pm #79169TEH WHALE
SpectatorCitan001 said:
The slap does not work right now. If we slap for any damage it goes through as a slay dont know why but thats why we dont use it.I just love how slap works… either it works or it *edited*S UP EVERYTHINg…. loved the good old time with meta… slap someone to death meant server crash
April 13, 2009 at 7:53 pm #79249Derrick LeBrocq
SpectatorUberslap, ftw.
April 14, 2009 at 7:18 pm #79537Ripc_Scarolina
SpectatorEx your a great admin and you also tried to help me out of game… I think you are one of the better admin!
April 14, 2009 at 8:42 pm #79558distemper
SpectatorEx, I think you’re great 99% of the time, but sometimes, you need to make a judgment call on some of the rules. Today, just a few minutes ago, you slayed me for “Not Doing the Objectives.” Normally, I would not have a problem with this, but the fact is, I was the only T left, CT’s were AWPing and had every exit covered, and there were about 10 Seconds left. No way I could get the bomb and plant it in time, unless I was hacking.
Counter-Strike is as much of an economic game as it is an FPS because we buy our weapons at the start of each round. In that situation, I made the call to not die and save money so I could get a better weapon the next round, and possibly do better. It is part of the strategy in CS:S.
Had the situation been different, and there were, say 45 seconds left, I would have moved around and found a different way to approach the bomb and/or eliminate the remaining CTs.
Because if my situation qualifies for a slay due to not doing objectives, every single CT who runs away from the bomb because they know a defuse isn’t possible in time(to save whatever weapons/armor they have) should be slayed as well.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Counter-Strike: Source Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.