MasterP said:
Considering the map was added and played without the CL’s knowledge or appoval I would say I’ve been more than open about the whole deal. I don’t want maps on the server that cause problems with our players. It shouldn’t matter if they are considered big or small, they are still problems that shouldn’t be in the final release of a map.
How is preventing future complaints in any way a problem?
This is just a precedent I don’t want to set. Find the solution and you can keep the map.
Based on my MSN chat with you a few weeks ago I was under the impression we didn’t have enough server capacity for a 2nd server. I will not split a 28 slot into two 16 or 18 slots, not when the 28 comes close to capacity on a regular basis and I don’t want to falsely advertise the server as being full or send people where they don’t want to go.
Now if I can have a 2nd 18-24 slot server let me know and I’ll be more than happy to get you a config.
It was something I saw while getting a replacement map for a broken CS map and I tossed it up to test one night when I was on. Bitey actually tested it and I’ve yet to play it.
As for the second server, if we take one of the TF2 servers down theres no reason we can’t run another CS:S server as long as we keep it at 24 players and 66 tic.