Home › Forum Archive › Other › Random › the laffs
- This topic has 9 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by
Ephraim.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 31, 2008 at 12:27 am #5164July 31, 2008 at 12:58 am #52853
Pink Monkey #13
Spectatorthat guy cracks me up.
July 31, 2008 at 1:10 am #52856Ephraim
SpectatorI thought Yahtzee’s first few reviews were funny (if flawed), but I stopped watching after his absolutely aweful Medal of Honor review. I’ve had some weird arguments with stupid people about this guy.
(And the Wet Blanket Award goes to….)
July 31, 2008 at 1:23 am #52857MajorMajorMajor
SpectatorTHE Ephraim said:
I thought Yahtzee’s first few reviews were funny (if flawed), but I stopped watching after his absolutely aweful Medal of Honor review. I’ve had some weird arguments with stupid people about this guy.(And the wet blanket award goes to….)
i will say that a couple of his reviews got me to WTF… but he’s generally been on point esp. with the halo 3 one lol
July 31, 2008 at 1:40 am #52858Ephraim
SpectatorMajorMajorMajor said:
i will say that a couple of his reviews got me to WTF… but he’s generally been on point esp. with the halo 3 one lolNah. The Halo 3 review was where a lot of these ridiculous arguments originated. It was funny, but did not count as a legitimate review. He barely mentioned multiplayer (the most popular feature of the series) because he “didn’t care about it.” Imagine a music magazine reviewer going to an AC/DC concert. Now imagine that reviewer writing an article about how the opening act was decent, but only mentioning AC/DC in the last paragraph because he “doesn’t really get them.” He would be fired. The same principal applies to the Halo 3 review.
The MOH review got me arguing with a caveman-looking loser about politics. It was like a whole new universe of stupid. Sorry to get off topic. Just remembering that fat, hairy idiot makes me want to punch something.
July 31, 2008 at 1:57 am #52859MajorMajorMajor
SpectatorTHE Ephraim said:
Nah. The Halo 3 review was where a lot of these ridiculous arguments originated. It was funny, but did not count as a legitimate review. He barely mentioned multiplayer (the most popular feature of the series) because he “didn’t care about it.” Imagine a music magazine reviewer going to an AC/DC concert. Now imagine that reviewer writing an article about how the opening act was decent, but only mentioning AC/DC in the last paragraph because he “doesn’t really get them.” He would be fired. The same principal applies to the Halo 3 review.The MOH review got me arguing with a caveman-looking loser about politics. It was like a whole new universe of stupid. Sorry to get off topic. Just remembering that fat, hairy idiot makes me want to punch something.

hahahah very true
then clarification: game play and microsoft beating halo into our systems = very on point
therefore because the multiplayer is sweet=game isnt as bad as he says

(still biased towards it tho)
July 31, 2008 at 5:09 am #52860Cacophony
Spectator
Yahtzee makes me laugh.I like his reviews.
July 31, 2008 at 8:12 am #52862Nickname
SpectatorI love that whenever he refers to perfection in his reviews it shows a small picture of Portal. Priceless.
Seriously though I love these reviews and always have (I actually didn’t even bother to click the link to see which review you had linked to)
July 31, 2008 at 8:50 am #52863MajorMajorMajor
SpectatorNickname said:
(I actually didn’t even bother to click the link to see which review you had linked to)</3
July 31, 2008 at 9:09 pm #52913Ephraim
SpectatorThe video was funny, but I’m still going to buy most of those games, and they’ll probably be great. I’m rarely disappointed with my purchases.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Random’ is closed to new topics and replies.