o.O

Home › Forum Archive › Other › Random › o.O

Viewing 29 posts - 1 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5055
    MajorMajorMajor
    Spectator

    http://rawstory.com/news/2008/CNN_reporter…watch_0716.html

     

    AND

     

    http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/watchlistcounter.html

     

    i will have to say that i dunno much bout the ACLU but if all is true…. sum changes need be changing

    #51547
    Ephraim
    Spectator

    MajorMajorMajor said:

    i will have to say that i dunno much bout the ACLU but if all is true…. sum changes need be changing

     

    Never, ever trust the ACLU. Ever.

     

    Ever.

    #51568
    MasterP
    Spectator

    MajorMajorMajor said:

    http://rawstory.com/news/2008/CNN_reporter…watch_0716.html

     

    AND

     

    http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/watchlistcounter.html

     

    i will have to say that i dunno much bout the ACLU but if all is true…. sum changes need be changing

     

    Your problem is that you actually believe what ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC tell you. I won’t even get into how bad the ACLU lies about quite literally everything.

     

    I thought you were smarter than that, guess I’ll have to reconsider your admin on CSS :unsure:

    #51573

    Its amazing how many lies are make the “news” even small pointless worthless meningless stuff they lie about.. it really blows my mind. They say what the people wont to here no matter what. MasterP is correct i’d trust a kid in middleschool storie over a professional news cast.

    #51574
    MasterP
    Spectator

    I’ve always been partial to Fox as their stories have always seemed much closer to making common sense and lately they’ve adopted the policy of confirming the big stories before running with them. Whether you hate them or not, you have to agree that’s a policy the rest obviously don’t do.

    #51576
    Ephraim
    Spectator

    I will admit that the DHS has some problems. When the next plane blows up (knock-knock-knock) it won’t be the doing of a little old lately smugling a plastic explosive in a tube of toothpaste. I flew earlier this week. One of the folks at the gates looked through my bag and found some toothpaste. She shook her head and made a sound like “Uh-uh-uh.” She confiscated the tube and gave me back my bag. My inner-smartass wanted to say “praise allah most high” before leaving, but I decided it would be better to reach my location that day.

    #51577
    Poopie
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    I’ve always been partial to Fox as their stories have always seemed much closer to making common sense and lately they’ve adopted the policy of confirming the big stories before running with them. Whether you hate them or not, you have to agree that’s a policy the rest obviously don’t do.

     

    FOX news is garbage.

    #51578
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Poopie said:

    FOX news is garbage.

     

    Compared to?

    #51579
    Ephraim
    Spectator

    The man named after excrement raises an interesting point.

    (jk luvyouluvyouluvyouluvyou!)

    #51581
    MasterP
    Spectator

    He seems to be comparing it to something. Most of the other stations have had people forced out over falsified interviews and reports, to my knowledge Fox hasn’t.

     

    On the original subject, did the CNN reporter interview or talk to known terrorists? That WILL get you on the list, as it should. If the story is true I imagine part of the story wasn’t reported. It’s not like CNN doesn’t leave out important bits and pieces when it suits them.

    #51593
    MajorMajorMajor
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    I’ve always been partial to Fox

     

     

    and that is where the disagreement begins …

     

     

    and to clarify: when reading the news i first go to BBC news, then digg where i found the latter article

     

    and yes i kno digg is never reliable

    #51616
    Pink Monkey #16
    Spectator

    Majin Ephraim said:

    My inner-smartass wanted to say “praise allah most high” before leaving, but I decided it would be better to reach my location that day.

     

    Lolz, I laughed hard at that.

     

     

    I have to take the same tact when I watch the news. You just never can tell who’s leaving out something or outrightly lying about it. I’ve found that media bias, no matter who its from, is generally manifested in the parts of the stories or even whole stories that they don’t tell.

     

    Just as an example. (Don’t flame me please.) Last year when Iraq was mayhem, you heard about it all the time. Now its mostly peaceful, and we don’t hear anything. The same amount (more in fact) of our troops are there, but the media preys on bad news. That’s why we hear so much about the economy right now.

     

    Speaking of which have any of you been hearing the familiar story that runs around Black Friday of every year since about 2001? It goes something like “Consumers will be tightening their wallets this Christmas as the soaring price of gas and a generally weakening economy takes its toll.” I believe there has been record consumer spending at Christmas every year for the past 20 or more years. My point is this…. you also have to filter out the baseless speculation that the media is prone to do. When they can’t find enough depressing news, they speculate that there will be some in the future and so *poof* they have something to talk about tonight on their news cast.

    #51618
    Nickname
    Spectator

    I find FOX news to be about the worst TBH… whenever I watch them it is so obvious how full of crap they are it is retarded. I don’t know what I think is the best… I don’t think there is a best TBH, but I would say BBC news is “decent”. To be honest though I don’t read much about current events online… I just read about tech news from engadget and dailytech… and they are far from reliable sourcees.

    #51622
    Nickname
    Spectator

    Actually, the best sources of current events news are the Daily Show and the Tonight Show with Jay Leno. Seriously. Its not funny if its not true. Or something like that.

    #51629
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Nickname said:

    Actually, the best sources of current events news are the Daily Show

     

    LoL

     

    You do know he wasn’t born John Stuart, right? He’s the least reliable source of what you might call information as any of them.

     

    BBC used to be terrible but they’ve been getting better over the last few years, mainly because they aren’t based over here so they have to do at least a little research before running with something.

     

    If you’re counting comedians and talk show hosts, the two you listed are in the lower half of the “has the most informed audience” list. When Bush gets out of office he’s going to run out of stuff to make fun of so idk how much longer his show will run. If McCain doesn’t get elected he’ll have almost nothing to talk about.

    #51630
    Nickname
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    LoL

     

    You do know he wasn’t born John Stuart, right? He’s the least reliable source of what you might call information as any of them.

     

    BBC used to be terrible but they’ve been getting better over the last few years, mainly because they aren’t based over here so they have to do at least a little research before running with something.

     

    If you’re counting comedians and talk show hosts, the two you listed are in the lower half of the “has the most informed audience” list. When Bush gets out of office he’s going to run out of stuff to make fun of so idk how much longer his show will run. If McCain doesn’t get elected he’ll have almost nothing to talk about.

    First, it’s John Stewart; second, he doesn’t make up the jokes. Maybe that makes him a bad comedian, maybe not. That isn’t the point; nor is whether or not the audience is informed. I would rather get my news from Jay Leno than Dan Rather/Katie Couric/etc anyday

    #51634
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Nickname said:

    First, it’s John Stewart; second, he doesn’t make up the jokes. Maybe that makes him a bad comedian, maybe not. That isn’t the point; nor is whether or not the audience is informed. I would rather get my news from Jay Leno than Dan Rather/Katie Couric/etc anyday

     

    You missed my point…

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Stewart

     

    He changed his name b/c he didn’t think Jews could succeed in Hollywood.

     

    Second, idc who makes his jokes, my point remains. He’s going to run out of rebulican material if Obama wins and he’ll have to make fun of democrats, something most of his audience will not like.

     

    As for Rather/Couric, good point. They fail at life.

    #51635
    Nickname
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    You missed my point…

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Stewart

     

    He changed his name b/c he didn’t think Jews could succeed in Hollywood.

     

    Second, idc who makes his jokes, my point remains. He’s going to run out of rebulican material if Obama wins and he’ll have to make fun of democrats, something most of his audience will not like.

     

    As for Rather/Couric, good point. They fail at life.

    Jon Stewart won’t have nearly the problem that Stephen Colbert will. Not even close.

     

    Also, love the reference to wikipedia. Talk about reliable sources.

    #51636
    Pink Monkey #16
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    Second, idc who makes his jokes, my point remains. He’s going to run out of rebulican material if Obama wins and he’ll have to make fun of democrats, something most of his audience will not like.

     

    Its not that his audience won’t like it, you can’t make fun of Obama w/o being called a racist.

    #51637
    Nickname
    Spectator

    Another great site for news: theonion.com It even says right there under its name “America’s Finest News Source”.

     

    MasterP: that was a joke.

    #51643
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Nickname said:

    Also, love the reference to wikipedia. Talk about reliable sources.

     

    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0829537/bio

     

    http://www.tvguide.com/celebrities/jon-stewart/bio/158563

     

    http://www.answers.com/topic/jon-stewart?c…inment&nr=1

     

    http://www.tv.com/jon-stewart/person/26557/biography.html

     

    http://tv.yahoo.com/jon-stewart/contributor/28961/bio

     

    http://movies.nytimes.com/person/235015/Jo…ewart-Leibowitz

     

    http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/…%20Encyclopedia

     

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jon+stewart

     

    Wikipedia isn’t really that less accurate than Britannica btw. It’s science articles average almost twice the length, if the “official” encylopedia even has an article for it. Don’t believe me, try doing optics research in a field that barely exists.

     

    http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html

    #51644
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Nickname said:

    MasterP: that was a joke.

     

    Too late…

     

    lol

    #51649
    Nickname
    Spectator

    MasterP said:

    Too late…

     

    lol

    Next time perhaps you could read all the responses before you make a ginormous response of links that I will never open lol.

     

    I was j/k about wikipedia anyhow. I actually used it as a source for a research paper before lol.

    #51650
    Ephraim
    Spectator

    WHY ARE MOMMY AND DADDY FIGHTING!!!

    #51651
    Nickname
    Spectator

    Majin Ephraim said:

    WHY ARE MOMMY AND DADDY FIGHTING!!!

    That is terrifying

    #51661
    MajorMajorMajor
    Spectator

    *edited* Master P breakin out the Britannica

     

     

    1000 “lol”s to you

    #51662
    MajorMajorMajor
    Spectator

    Majin Ephraim said:

    WHY ARE MOMMY AND DADDY FIGHTING!!!

    and which ones mommy and which ones daddy

     

     

    i say mommy is nickname

    #51663
    Ephraim
    Spectator

    MajorMajorMajor said:

    and which ones mommy and which ones daddy

     

    Wow. I didn’t think it out that far.

     

    But, seriously. Fox News is fine and late-night talk shows aren’t a reputable source of information.

    #51666
    MasterP
    Spectator

    Nickname said:

    Next time perhaps you could read all the responses before you make a ginormous response of links that I will never open lol.

     

    I was j/k about wikipedia anyhow. I actually used it as a source for a research paper before lol.

     

    When I started looking for links you hadn’t posted the j/k yet. But yeah, overkill. That was the point lol

     

    Btw, the engineering majors are encouraged to use it. It’s not good to quote for research but I have yet to see it be wrong about a math or science related topic. It’s definately got more accurate info than our textbooks, but those are ok to quote <_>

Viewing 29 posts - 1 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • The forum ‘Random’ is closed to new topics and replies.