Home › Forum Archive › Game Server Discussion › Counter-Strike: Source Discussion › source gun game??
- This topic has 24 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 19 years ago by
Liam.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 23, 2007 at 3:21 pm #3133
YahooEarth
SpectatorJust wondering if there is a WCU gun game for the source players?? And if not, why not??
October 23, 2007 at 3:59 pm #29104Brian
SpectatorNo there isn’t. We haven’t gotten around to it yet. We are getting our regular server close as possible to perfect atm.
October 23, 2007 at 4:12 pm #29105YahooEarth
SpectatorI guess that is a good excuse, but a gun game is in the plans for the future right? Cuz I loves me a good gun game…turbo reverse of course
October 23, 2007 at 4:29 pm #29108Brian
SpectatorYes it is in the plans for the future, it was discussed at the first club meeting of the year.
October 23, 2007 at 4:32 pm #29111YahooEarth
SpectatorOf course, I’m sorry I couldn’t make it to that one, I was indisposed…
October 23, 2007 at 8:26 pm #29140Phonetically Phamous (dice
SpectatorI vote for GGS we need this!!!!
October 23, 2007 at 8:36 pm #29144Bitey
SpectatorIts is of course my personal opinion that GG in source is much better.
October 26, 2007 at 4:16 am #29209Lemm
Spectatori used to play on another server (IUE5 – hopefully ya’ll have heard of it) a lot in the past and then they came out with their gun game server and basically what happened was that all the players on the regular sever just moved over to the gun game and it killed their other server….
they have 32 slots.. it was full all the time then gun game and …
it’s gotten a lot better since.. but it’s no where near as packed as it used to be… talkin 32/32 all the time… it also has a good community like the one here….
AND THEY ALLOW PRON SPRAYZ!@ – but i have come to like this group more… (that and i get a *edited*ing ping of 10 to this server)
October 26, 2007 at 8:16 am #29222Liam
SpectatorOctober 26, 2007 at 12:35 pm #29238YahooEarth
SpectatorI totally used to play IUE5 as well, but no points there, so a little less competitive. But I would never, NEVER leave this server for a gun game, just occasionally for a game or two to change it up a little. But seriously, make sure the gg is turbo, and reverse?
But maybe if its not turbo, everyone wont leave the server to go play gg.
October 26, 2007 at 1:00 pm #29246Phonetically Phamous (dice
Spectatori vote for ggs since zack wonts to take down gg 1.6
October 26, 2007 at 1:06 pm #29251Mr. Freeman
SpectatorIf we get a GG server, can we get SK and Deagle the *edited* off of the regular server?
If so, I support it, and will pay to see it happen.
October 26, 2007 at 1:08 pm #29253YahooEarth
SpectatorDon’t totally take sk3 and Deagle5 off, just put them on the night time “FUN” rotation, that might spark some interest in people playing after 1am, since I am apparently the only person with no life that plays every day after 1am… I need to get out more…
October 26, 2007 at 1:13 pm #29256Phonetically Phamous (dice
Spectatoras the top execs of the club love SK3 i doubt you see that map coming off anytime soon… however they arnt the only ones who like it… serverly typically stays full so a mix up is fun,, or people will be *edited*ing b/c its the same shat over and ova
October 26, 2007 at 2:33 pm #29263Liam
SpectatorWhy should we take them off? NoDice is right, most people love them. Heck I’ve seen the server go from dead to full in 5 minutes after changing it to SK3 or Deagle.
October 26, 2007 at 2:43 pm #29268YahooEarth
SpectatorTrue story, i love deagle and sk3!! but not when we play sk3 then a new map, then a new admin comes in and switches to sk3 immediately
not as fun…
October 26, 2007 at 2:53 pm #29270Phonetically Phamous (dice
SpectatorYahooEarth said:
True story, i love deagle and sk3!! but not when we play sk3 then a new map, then a new admin comes in and switches to sk3 immediatelynot as fun…
well then the problem is not SK
btw: though this was to see who was for gettting a GGS server
October 26, 2007 at 3:50 pm #29276Liam
SpectatorIf the server is full, admins shouldn’t be swapping the map anyway, and it should be a ‘vote’ irregardless.
October 26, 2007 at 4:03 pm #29277Bitey
SpectatorLiam irregardless is not a word
October 26, 2007 at 4:22 pm #29279Phonetically Phamous (dice
SpectatorBitey said:
Liam irregardless is not a word
Bitey,
Bitey not a word.
October 26, 2007 at 4:30 pm #29280Liam
SpectatorBitey said:
Liam irregardless is not a word
Yes it is.
October 26, 2007 at 5:15 pm #29281Bitey
Spectatorhttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irregardless
It is a word…kinda…but it is definitely nonstandard

And as for my name of course it isn’t a word, thats why it is my name
October 26, 2007 at 6:18 pm #29285Nickname
Spectatorif Liam == Lame
then irregardless == real word
October 26, 2007 at 8:01 pm #29291Bitey
Spectatorits more like Liam ~ Lame
Or whatever the symbol is for congruent. lol
October 26, 2007 at 8:13 pm #29292Liam
Spectator3
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Counter-Strike: Source Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.