I think loot makes a good point. In that admins need the power required to improve the servers situation when the need arises, that could be removing a hacker, revoting when only unpopular map choices are available etc.
But, admins arn’t given many potentially disruptive powers for very good and sound reasoning. It’s important to remember maturity beyond age isn’t something every admins is blessed (or is it cursed?) with, friendly and great individuals they may be, it does take an awful lot of responsibility and constant self discipline to maintain complete fairness in the face of the potential to have free reign. Such responsibility is something that the Admins should not have to be burdened with daily, nor something that the WCU hierarchy should then have to spend more and more time policing and dealing with, due to complaints based on opinions like, what constitutes a good map, when is ‘uberslapping’ appropriate etc.
Perhaps due to the declining nature of the CS1.6 community, some slack should be given to allow Admins to aid the server in attracting and retaining numbers. But the server should always be reined in far enough to keep to the standards of WCU that are the defining characteristics of this community of games players.