Fascist Flakes (Jagr) said:
MajorMajorMajor said:
So is the Alumni Adviser position just removed in favor of a non-position holding non-voting group of advisers? i like that… seems more efficient. (Until Kuros Bitey and MasterP get in an EpEEn contest)
It was bound to happen, it isn’t something that could be avoided and something SGA has wanted to happen for a while. I believe this constitution was written with MasterP’s involvement so I wouldn’t expect Bitey, Kuros, nor even myself (even though I’m still a student) to have an “epeen contest” about the matter.
I was asked to participate in the revision process and actually wrote the part about alumni involvement. You’ll find it hard to get an alumni to disagree with what’s been written. We can still be active in the club, can still participate in events, and can still give advice. We only lose one executive council vote which doesn’t really matter because that one vote has never been enough to change the outcome of an executive decision.
I also did the proofreading and final touchups 
Someone definately needs to IRC this so everyone can know how things go. The document is *edited* sexy compared to the overly amended and loophole filled version we’ve been using.